References
Nancy Cartwright
with Steed, S. , Contessa, G. (2011). Keeping track of Neurath's bill: abstract concepts, stock models and the unity of classical physics. In J. Symons, O. Pombo, & J. M. . Torres (Eds.). Otto Neurath and the unity of science (pp. 95-108). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2010). Models: parables v fables. In R. Frigg, & M. C. Hunter (Eds.). Beyond mimesis and convention (pp. 19-31). Dordrecht: Springer.
with Fennell, D. (2010). Does roush show that evidence should be probable? Synthese, 175 (3), 289-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9510-3.
(1999). Causal diversity and the Markov condition. Synthese, 121 (1-2), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005225629681.
(1996). Otto Neurath: philosophy between science and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1995). Précis of nature's capacities and their measurement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55 (1), 153-156.
(1995). Reply to Eells, Humphreys and Morrison. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55 (1), 177-187.
(1993). In defence of "this worldly" causality: comments on van Fraassen's laws and symmetry. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 53, 423-429.
(1993). Is natural science "natural" enough?: a reply to Philip Allport. Synthese, 94 (2), 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064341.
(1993). Marks and probabilities: two ways to find causal structure. In F. Stadler (Ed.). Scientific philosophy (pp. 113-119). Dordrecht: Springer.
(1991). Can wholism reconcile the inaccuracy of theory with the accuracy of prediction? Synthese, 89 (1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413796.
with Jones, M. (1991). How to hunt quantum causes. In W. Spohn (Ed.). Erkenntnis orientated (pp. 205-231). Dordrecht: Springer.
(1989). The Born-Einstein debate: where application and explanation separate. Synthese, 81 (3), 271-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869317.