Stathis Psillos
(2012). Adding modality to ontic structuralism: an exploration and critique. In E. Landry, & D. P. Rickles (Eds.). Structural realism (pp. 169-185). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2011). Choosing the realist framework. Synthese, 180 (2), 301-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9606-9.
with Ioannidis, S. (2017). In defense of methodological mechanism: the case of apoptosis. Axiomathes, 27 (6), 601-619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-017-9354-2.
(2004). Inference to the best explanation and bayesianism. In F. Stadler (Ed.). Induction and deduction in the sciences (pp. 83-91). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2009). Knowing the structure of nature: essays on realism and explanation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
(2011). Living with the abstract: realism and models. Synthese, 180 (1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9563-3.
(2011). On Reichenbach's argument for scientific realism. Synthese, 181 (1), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9594-9.
(2006). Ramsey's Ramsey-sentences. In M. C. Galavotti (Ed.). Cambridge and Vienna (pp. 67-90). Dordrecht: Springer.
with Ruttkamp-Bloem, E. (2017). Scientific realism: quo vadis? introduction. Synthese, 194 (9), 3187-3201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1493-x.
(2017). Scientific realism and the mind-independence of the world. In E. Agazzi (Ed.). Varieties of scientific realism (pp. 209-226). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2004). The book of evidence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 68 (3), 740-743.
(2007). The fine structure of inference to the best explanation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74 (2), 441-448.
(2011). The scope and limits of the no miracles argument1. In D. Dieks, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, M. Weber, & W. J. González (Eds.). Explanation, prediction, and confirmation (pp. 23-35). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2006). What do powers do when they are not manifested? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 72 (1), 137-156.