Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2004) Synthese 138 (3).
The terms ``objectivity'' and ``objective'' are among the mostused yet ill-defined terms in the philosophy of science and epistemology. Common to all thevarious usages is the rhetorical force of ``I endorse this and you should too'', orto put it more mildly, that one should trust the outcome of the objectivity-producing process.The persuasive endorsement and call to trust provide some conceptual coherenceto objectivity, but the reference to objectivity is hopefully not merely an attemptat persuasive endorsement. What, in addition to epistemological endorsement,does objectivity carry with it? Drawing on recent historical and philosophical work,I articulate eight operationally accessible and distinct senses of objectivity.While there are links among these senses, providing cohesion to the concept, I argue thatnone of the eight senses is strictly reducible to the others, giving objectivity itsirreducible complexity.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1023/B:SYNT.0000016451.18182.91
Full citation:
Douglas, H. (2004). The irreducible complexity of objectivity. Synthese 138 (3), pp. 453-473.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.