Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2009) Synthese 168 (2).
In this paper, I argue for a view largely favorable to the Thirder view: when Sleeping Beauty wakes up on Monday, her credence in the coin’s landing heads is less than 1/2. Let’s call this “the Lesser view.” For my argument, I (i) criticize Strict Conditionalization as the rule for changing de se credences; (ii) develop a new rule; and (iii) defend it by Gaifman’s Expert Principle. Finally, I defend the Lesser view by making use of this new rule.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-008-9443-2
Full citation:
Kim, N. (2009). Sleeping beauty and shifted Jeffrey conditionalization. Synthese 168 (2), pp. 295-312.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.