Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2013) Synthese 190 (1).
I outline four competing probabilistic accounts of contrastive evidential support and consider various considerations that might help arbitrate between these. The upshot of the discussion is that the so-called ‘Law of Likelihood’ is to be preferred to any of the alternatives considered.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-010-9845-9
Full citation:
Chandler, J. (2013). Contrastive confirmation: some competing accounts. Synthese 190 (1), pp. 129-138.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.