234850

(2016) Synthese 193 (8).

Why paraphrase nihilism fails

Shane Maxwell Wilkins

pp. 2619-2632

Nihilists cannot square their position with common sense simply by paraphrasing away apparent ontological commitments in ordinary language. I argue for this claim by analogy. Paraphrase atheism says there is no God, but tries to square the truth of atheism with ordinary religious sentences by paraphrasing away apparent ontological commitments. Obviously, paraphrase does not reconcile atheism with ordinary language about God. I discuss two different reasons that paraphrase can fail and suggest that both reasons afflict paraphrase nihilism. Hence, paraphrase nihilism cannot reconcile nihilism and common sense, and so nihilists must look for some other strategy that can evade the force of the Atheism Case.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-0869-z

Full citation:

Maxwell Wilkins, S. (2016). Why paraphrase nihilism fails. Synthese 193 (8), pp. 2619-2632.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.