Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2017) Synthese 194 (11).
One question of the bounds of cognition is that of which things have it. A scientifically relevant debate on this question must explain the persistent and selective use of psychological predicates to report findings throughout biology: for example, that neurons prefer, plants and fruit flies decide, and bacteria communicate linguistically. This paper argues that these claims should enjoy default literal interpretation, and that these reports of psychological properties in non-humans are as straightforward as they seem. An epistemic consequence is that these findings can contribute directly to understanding the nature of psychological capacities.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-014-0603-2
Full citation:
Figdor, C. (2017). On the proper domain of psychological predicates. Synthese 194 (11), pp. 4289-4310.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.