Repository | Book | Chapter

231704

(2013) Aristotle and the philosophy of law, Dordrecht, Springer.

Controversy and practical reason in Aristotle

Nuno M.M.S. Coelho

pp. 87-108

This chapter aims to show how the Aristotelian theory of practical reasoning presupposes and mobilises a linguistic community in a specific sense and to understand the dialogical structure assumed by practical reason.We follow two lines of argumentation.From the reconstruction of Aristotle's cultural background – Athens shackled by the antilogical perspective that was disseminated among sophists and sceptical thinkers in the fifth and fourth centuries – we see how Aristotle addresses this central statement (the provocative Protagorean doctrine of ">antilogiae) and how his entire philosophy is influenced by it.Dialogue, contrasting opinions and linguistic controversy not only structure Aristotle's methods in the practical sciences but are also assumed to be at the very heart of his conception of human beings, political communities and eudaimonia.At the same time, a language community works as a model for the phenomenological reconstruction of practical reason. The deliberation process seems to be a dialogue, as decisions result from the intervention of different dimensions of the soul. One's soul is analogically described as an Agora; the mind is a stage wherein many voices coexist, and sometimes fight.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6031-8_5

Full citation:

M.M.S. Coelho, N. (2013)., Controversy and practical reason in Aristotle, in L. Huppes-Cluysenaer & N. M.m.s. coelho (eds.), Aristotle and the philosophy of law, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 87-108.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.