Repository | Book | Chapter
(1987) Naturalistic epistemology, Dordrecht, Springer.
Professor Shimony's fair comment on my paper provides me with an opportunity to clarify some points which because of their concise presentation may not appear entirely clear. I am glad to note that there are some large areas of agreement between us while the differences of view — some of them at least — are apparently due to misunderstanding rather than to the lack of agreement. I am going to comment on his comments in the same order in which he formulated them.
Publication details
Full citation:
Čapek, M. (1987)., Reply to Shimony, in A. Shimony & D. Nails (eds.), Naturalistic epistemology, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 115-118.