Repository | Book | Chapter
(2006) Revisiting discovery and justification, Dordrecht, Springer.
Context of discovery versus context of justification and Thomas Kuhn
Paul Hoyningen-Huene
pp. 119-131
Let me begin with a convention. I will refer to the distinction between the context of discovery and the context of justification as "the DJ distinction" (where I may note, for potentially misled younger readers, that this "DJ" has nothing to do with the music business). This paper is based on an older paper of mine (Hoyningen-Huene 1987). In the present paper, I will first recapitulate some of the topics of the older paper, and will contribute further considerations. Subsequently, I will discuss Thomas Kuhn's ideas about justification in science. Thus will be clarified, in which sense precisely Kuhn opposed the DJ distinction. This is noteworthy, because in the 1960s and 1970s, many philosophers concluded from Kuhn's opposition to the context distinction that he just did not understand what it was all about (and they inferred from this that he was just too uneducated as a philosopher to be taken seriously).
Publication details
Full citation:
Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2006)., Context of discovery versus context of justification and Thomas Kuhn, in J. Schickore & F. Steinle (eds.), Revisiting discovery and justification, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 119-131.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.