Free trade and exploitation

Cristian Dimitriu

pp. 101-108

According to a popular view, defended by Pogge and other, trade agreements between wealthy and poor countries, as currently structured, are coercive and unfair for developing countries. Against this view, I argue that such agreements should be understood as exploitative instead of coercive. The difference between these two notions is a substantial one, as in the case of coercive proposals one of the parties is made worse off, while in the case of exploitative proposals both parties improve their situation. I rely on familiar accounts of coercion and exploitation, defended by Wertheimer, to make this point.

Publication details

DOI: 10.6018/daimon/167491

Full citation:

Dimitriu, C. (2014). Free trade and exploitation. Daimon Revista Internacional de Filosofia 62, pp. 101-108.

This document is available at an external location. Please follow the link below. Hold the CTRL button to open the link in a new window.