Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2006) Human Studies 29 (4).
I am grateful to the program committee of SPEP for organizing the session from which these papers are drawn. It is an honor to be recognized in this way by an organization to which I’ve belonged since its (and my) struggling earliest days, which I’ve served as an officer in past years, and to which I always return for its reliably outstanding programs and for the opportunity to see old and new friends. The session itself was lively and enjoyable, and I’m grateful to all those who attended, and to my former student, Prof. Margret Grebowicz, who with characteristic humor and good grace kept things from getting out of hand. In the following we cannot recapture the immediacy of that discussion, but at least I have the opportunity to put my own rather rambling responses into intelligible form. Or so I hope. I could not have wished for a more stellar or capable panel than my three colleagues Casey, Crowell, and Kearney. They all belong to the phenomenological tradition, but...
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s10746-007-9043-z
Full citation:
Carr, D. (2006). Response to Casey, Crowell and Kearney. Human Studies 29 (4), pp. 491-501.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.