Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2016) Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (1).
This paper responds to Dan Hutto's paper, "Narrative Self-Shaping: a Modest Proposal'. Hutto there attacks the "strong" narrativism defended in my recent book, "Self, Value and Narrative' and in recent work by Marya Schechtman. I rebut Hutto's argument that non-narrative forms of evaluative self-shaping can plausibly be conceived, and defend the notion of implicit narrative against his criticisms. I conclude by briefly indicating some difficulties that arise for the "modest" form of narrativism that Hutto defends.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s11097-014-9357-z
Full citation:
Rudd, A. (2016). "Strong" narrativity: a response to Hutto. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (1), pp. 43-49.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.