Repository | Book | Chapter
(2017) A companion to Wittgenstein on education, Dordrecht, Springer.
The motivations for the claim that language is innate are, for many, quite straightforward. The innateness of language is seen as the only way to solve the so-called logical problem of language acquisition : the mismatch between linguistic input and linguistic output. In this paper, I begin by unravelling several strands of the nativist argument, offering replies as I go along. I then give an outline of Wittgenstein's view of language acquisition , showing how it renders otiose problems posed by nativists like Chomsky —not least by means of Wittgenstein's own brand of grammar which, unlike Chomsky's, does not reside in the brain, but in our practices .
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-3136-6_38
Full citation:
Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2017)., Universal grammar: Wittgenstein versus Chomsky, in M. A. Peters & J. Stickney (eds.), A companion to Wittgenstein on education, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 573-599.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.