Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2003) Synthese 137 (1-2).
This paper examines two arguments againstpsychologism advanced by Frege andHusserl. The first argument says that thelaws of logic cannot be justified by thelaws of psychology, because the formerand a priori and certain, but the latterare probable only. The second argumentpoints out that the status of logicallaws as universal principles of thinking isnot intelligible on the psychologisticinterpretation of logic. The author tries toshow how to examine both arguments bymetalogical devices.
Publication details
Full citation:
Woleński, J. (2003). Psychologism and metalogic. Synthese 137 (1-2), pp. 179-193.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.