Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2010) Synthese 176 (3).
In this paper, a new account of empirical claims in structuralism is developed. Its novelty derives from the use that is made of the linguistic approach to scientific theories despite the presumed incompatibility of structuralism with that approach. It is shown how the linguistic approach can be applied to the framework of structuralism if the semantic foundations of that approach are refined to do justice to the doctrine of indirect interpretation of theoretical terms. This doctrine goes back to Carnap but has been advanced until the present day without a proper semantic explanation.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-009-9561-5
Full citation:
Andreas, H. (2010). New account of empirical claims in structuralism. Synthese 176 (3), pp. 311-332.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.