Repository | Book | Chapter

212362

(2015) Bruce M. Russett, Dordrecht, Springer.

The calculus of deterrence

Bruce M. Russett

pp. 36-52

A persistent problem for American political and military planners has been the question of how to defend "third areas." How can a major power make credible an intent to defend a smaller ally from attack by another major power? Simply making an explicit promise to defend an ally, whether that promise is embodied in a formal treaty or merely in a unilateral declaration, is not sufficient. There have been too many instances when 'solemn oaths' were forgotten in the moment of crisis. On the other hand, more than once a major power has taken up arms to defend a nation with whom it had ties appreciably less binding than a formal commitment. If a deterrer is to be firm, the prospective gains from a successful policy of firmness must be greater, when weighted by the probability of success and discounted by the cost and probability of war, than the losses from retreat.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13850-3_3

Full citation:

Russett, B. M. (2015)., The calculus of deterrence, in H. Starr (ed.), Bruce M. Russett, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 36-52.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.