Repository | Book | Chapter

Jacques Derrida never wrote on Karl Marx. Jacques Derrida held a few public talks on Karl Marx that were immediately published as books, despite the fact that in these talks he deliberately defended a certain spirit of Marx against the ruling ideology of anticommunism. As he admits himself, "for reasons that remain to be analysed, and compared to most of my other books, this one [Spectres de Marx] was, let's put it this way, distributed, bought and translated a lot faster and more widely. I didn't say "read"" ("pour des raisons qui restent à analyser, et par comparaison avec la plupart de mes autres livres, celui-ci a été plus vite et plus largement, disons, diffusé, acheté et traduit. Je ne dis pas "lu""; Derrida, 1997, 54). Apparently, the only ideology more effective than anticommunism in the academia of the 1990s was de constructionism. So Derrida's speeches on Marx were always already writing — writing not only in the quasi-transcendental sense so dear to deconstructionists but also in the institutional sense, no less dear to certain Marxisms, of two books: Spectres de Marx, which almost immediately reappeared as Specters of Marx, and, a few years later, Marx en jeu, an edited volume that included Derrida's talks on Spectres de Marx and on Jean-Pierre Vincent's theatre piece based on that book. Thus, this writing was the only possible fulfilment of a "desire" to do the "impossible", to which Derrida (1993a, p. 201) admitted in 1989: "[T]oday, when in France any reference to Marx has become forbidden, impossible, immediately catalogued, I have a real desire to speak about Marx, to teach Marx — and I will if I can."

DOI: 10.1057/9781137352835_9

Full citation: