Repository | Book | Chapter
(2014) Neuroscience, neurophilosophy and pragmatism, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
One of the more lively current debates in philosophy of cognitive science and philosophy of mind is over the possibility of extended cognition. Recently, though, this debate has hit a dead end, with proponents and opponents agreeing that whether cognition is sometimes extended is an empirical matter, but not knowing what an empirical demonstration of extended cognition would look like.
Publication details
Full citation:
Wagman, J. B. , Chemero, A. (2014)., The end of the debate over extended cognition, in T. Solymosi & J. Shook (eds.), Neuroscience, neurophilosophy and pragmatism, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 105-124.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.