Repository | Book | Chapter
(2014) New directions in the philosophy of science, Dordrecht, Springer.
In this paper, I critically discuss two of Mark Colyvan's case studies. After a short exposition of Colyvan's program, I first comment on the Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model. I agree with Colyvan's thesis that mathematical models in population ecology can be explanatory. The historical fathers of mathematical population ecology anticipated this thesis. However, the issue of idealization is not sufficiently emphasized; Volterra's discussion of the predator-prey model shows that he was acutely aware of the problem of idealization. As to the second case, I point out that the explanation of the structure of the bee's honeycomb, based on the mathematical honeycomb conjecture, is not a scientific explanation at all.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04382-1_6
Full citation:
Räz, T. (2014)., Comment on "the undeniable effectiveness of mathematics in the special sciences", in D. Dieks, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, M. Weber & M. C. Galavotti (eds.), New directions in the philosophy of science, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 75-84.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.