Repository | Book | Chapter

191917

(2013) Paraconsistency, Dordrecht, Springer.

On modal logics defining Jaśkowski's D2-consequence

Marek Nasieniewski , Andrzej Pietruszczak

pp. 141-161

Jaśkowski's logic D 2 (as a set of formulae) was formulated with the help of the modal logic S5 (see Jaśkowski, Stud Soc Sci Torun I(5):57–77, 1948; Stud Soc Sci Torun I(8):171–172, 1949). In Furmanowski (Stud Log 34:39–43, 1975), Perzanowski (Rep Math Log 5:63–72, 1975), Nasieniewski and Pietruszczak (Bull Sect Logic 37(3–4):197–210, 2008) it was shown that to define D 2 one can use normal and regular logics weaker than S5. In his paper Jaśkowski used a deducibility relation which we will denote by⊢D 2 and which fulfilled the following condition: A 1,,A n ⊢;D 2 B iff (ulcorner lozenge {A}_{1}^{ullet } ightarrow (ldots ightarrow (lozenge {A}_{n}^{ullet } ightarrow lozenge {B}^{ullet })ldots ,)urcorner in mathbf{S5}), where (−) is a translation of discussive formulae into the modal language. We indicate the weakest normal and the weakest regular modal logic which define D 2 -consequence.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4438-7_9

Full citation:

Nasieniewski, M. , Pietruszczak, A. (2013)., On modal logics defining Jaśkowski's D2-consequence, in K. Tanaka, F. Berto, E. D. Mares & F. Paoli (eds.), Paraconsistency, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 141-161.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.