Repository | Book | Chapter
(2013) The threads of natural law, Dordrecht, Springer.
The competing sources of Aquinas' natural law
Aristotle, roman law and the early Christian fathers
Anna Taitslin
pp. 47-63
The paper's focus is on the inner strain in Aquinas' Natural Law, first pointed out by Suarez, as a conflict between the competing visions of rational nature: natural power of reason versus natural inclination. The paper's aim is to vindicate Suarez" critique of Aquinas' concept of Natural Law as natural inclination.The paper argues that Aquinas' Aristotelian concept of purposeness of nature, unable to account for genuine Free Will or contingency, resulted in his notion of Natural Law as natural inclination. This notion went against the early Christian vision of Natural Law as a law given to men exclusively, being endowed with reason and, thus, capable of understanding God's command. This vision was reasserted by Suarez, who perceived its incompatibility with Aquinas' notion of Natural Law as natural inclination.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5656-4_4
Full citation:
Taitslin, A. (2013)., The competing sources of Aquinas' natural law: Aristotle, roman law and the early Christian fathers, in F. J. Contreras (ed.), The threads of natural law, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 47-63.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.