Repository | Book | Chapter

Comments on "concepts of function and mechanism in medicine and medical science" and "organs, organisms and disease"

Patrick A Heelan

pp. 85-93

The first great work on the philosophy of medicine is Claude Bernard's An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine 1 which was written just over one hundred years ago. Bernard was one of the first proponents of an organismic vision of life — neither crudely mechanistic nor vitalistic — that affirmed both the universal validity of physio-chemical laws in the biological domain and the existence of special non-reducible features, physiological in character, of living matter. For Bernard, the body was a "living machine"2 not exempted from the laws of physics and chemistry, and a "creative idea" which "expresses itself" through physio-chemical means. Physio-chemical means, he continues, "are common to all natural phenomena and remain mingled, pell-mell, like the letters of the alphabet in a box till a force goes to fetch them, to express the most varied thoughts and mechanisms."3 For Bernard, then, organs were like words, and individual organisms were like sentences. Here Bernard's — and Toulmin's — analysis would stop. Wartofsky, however, would go one step further and say that socio-historical communities of organisms are like languages: diseases which for Bernard and Toulmin then are pathologies of "words;" and "sentences" are for Wartofsky principally pathologies of"languages."

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-1769-5_6

Full citation:

Heelan, P.A. (1975)., Comments on "concepts of function and mechanism in medicine and medical science" and "organs, organisms and disease", in T. Engelhardt & S. Spicker (eds.), Evaluation and explanation in the biomedical sciences, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 85-93.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.