Repository | Book | Chapter

One of the most conspicuous changes in the relationship between ecological thought and critical theory has resulted from the recognition that an ecological perspective on culture and literature is neither entirely new in the history of critical theory, nor that it is inherently opposed to positions of modern and postmodern aesthetics and theory. On the contrary, it has become evident that ecocriticism can only fully realize its rich potential through its dialogue with modern and postmodern theory and aesthetics, in the same way in which the latter needs to be redefined in new, more complex ways by the inclusion of an ecological dimension into their discourses. Important versions of critical and aesthetic theory have already anticipated an ecological perspective and are being reappraised on a broad scale from this new angle. This is one of the more surprising turns of recent literary and cultural studies after a phase in which ecocriticism and critical theory had mutually ignored each other as if they existed on different planets of thought. In their radical constructivist epistemology, critical theory and cultural studies had relegated "nature', in their high phase of academic currency, from the domain of serious scholarly occupation altogether, declaring it a mere ideological fabrication which only served to hide interests of political power and dominance. Ecocriticism on the other hand (over-)reacted to this extreme form of cultural constructivism with wholesale rejection rather than with a differentiated assessment of relevant insights of critical theory.Meanwhile, one of the major activities of literary and cultural critics has become to discover intersections and common agendas between ecology and critical theory, which, as it turns out, have not just newly emerged but have been there all along. The list of precursors to modern ecological thought, which is rapidly expanding, by now contains leading philosophers and theorists that before had exclusively been claimed for positions of new historicism, postmodernism, or deconstruction, a fact which attests as much to the former self-immunization and mutual blindness of these competing scholarly paradigms as to their recently demonstrated capacity to open themselves up to a productive dialogue.

DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-47428-5_15

Full citation: