The role of imagination in James's and Dewey's understanding of religious experience

Romain Mollard

Many aspects of The Varieties of Religious Experience found their theoretical background in other books of James psychology or philosophy. In this article I try to connect his theory of imagination in The Principle of Psychology with his supernaturalism regarding religious experience. Both suppose a theory of the “feeling of reality” that explains how, under the working of imagination, abstract ideas or remote ideals can be perceived as real and lively, becoming motives for action, although they may not have anything to do with sense experience. Although imagination is not mentioned in James’s doctrine of the will to believe, it is central in both understanding this doctrine as well as the overall vision of James psychology and philosophy of religion. Similarly, imagination is essential to grasp a better understanding of how ideas and ideals unite with reality in Dewey’s thoughts concerning religion. I find it useful, in order to have a better understanding of James position, to compare it with what Dewey has to say about it in A Common Faith. Contrasting their theories will show that James’s understanding of imagination can only be understood if rooted in a kind of realism about the ‘unseen universe’.

Publication details

DOI: 10.4000/ejpap.576

Full citation:

Mollard, R. (2013). The role of imagination in James's and Dewey's understanding of religious experience. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 5 (1), pp. n/a.

This document is available at an external location. Please follow the link below. Hold the CTRL button to open the link in a new window.