Repository | Book | Chapter

The phenomenological derivation of oughts and shalls from ises or why it is right to take the stairs

Lester Embree

pp. 83-88

The impossibility of logically deriving "oughts," i. e., norms or, better, evaluational propositions, from "ises," i. e., theoretical or, better, cognitional propositions, is now widely accepted. That a great deal of effort has been devoted to this question of derivation nevertheless suggests that something has been dimly glimpsed. Perhaps the derivability is other than directly logical.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-9446-2_6

Full citation:

Embree, L. (2000)., The phenomenological derivation of oughts and shalls from ises or why it is right to take the stairs, in O. K. Wiegand, R. J. Dostal, L. Embree, J. Kockelmans & J. N. Mohanty (eds.), Phenomenology on Kant, German idealism, hermeneutics and logic, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 83-88.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.