Repository | Book | Chapter
(2014) New directions in the philosophy of science, Dordrecht, Springer.
Three objections to Max Urchs's paper on complexity are discussed. First, Urchs's macroeconomic illustrations of the benefits of complexity thinking are open to more conventional interpretations. Second, Urchs formulates a thesis concerning the relationship between science and society which is untenable if taken as a historical claim and insufficiently developed if taken as a metaphor. Third, methodological problems in history and philosophy of science plague Urchs's discussion of neuroscience.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04382-1_15
Full citation:
Scholl, R. (2014)., Confessions of a complexity skeptic, in D. Dieks, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, M. Weber & M. C. Galavotti (eds.), New directions in the philosophy of science, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 221-233.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.