Some problems for conditionalization and reflection
I will present five puzzles which show that rational people can update their degrees of belief in manners that violate Bayesian Conditionalization and van Fraassen's Reflection Principle. I will then argue that these violations of Conditionalization and Reflection are due to the fact that there are two, as yet unrecognized, ways in which the degrees of belief of rational people can develop.
Arntzenius, F. (2016)., Some problems for conditionalization and reflection, in H. Arló-Costa, V. F. Hendricks & J. Van Benthem (eds.), Readings in formal epistemology, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 163-176.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.