Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2009) Rivista di estetica 42.
Over the past twenty years the expression “thought experiment” (Gedankenexperiment) has become part of the philosophical vocabulary. Galileo’s thought experiment on the fall of bodies is an example that shows how thought experimentation might be an important scientific tool in order to acquire new knowledge. Nonetheless, the epistemological validity of thought experiments is still questioned in the domains different from physics.The paper aims to investigate whether the thought experimentation is really proper to physics. For this sake, biology will be our testbed. The skeptical view on biological thought experiments, e.g. Snooks, implies that the thought experiment is not an experiment; it is just the copy of a real one.We adopt a more positive view, inspired by Bokulich and Lennox, and we apply it to some Darwinian thought experiments. This analysis points to the fact that, much alike thought experiments in physics, Darwin’s ones in biology test the non-empirical criteria of a theory. Therefore, we advance the hypothesis that even biological thought experiments participate to such a re-ordering of processes and mechanisms, as to push a theory beyond its time.
Publication details
Full citation:
Arcangeli, M. (2009). Il posto delle favole. Rivista di estetica 42, pp. 3-19.
This document is available at an external location. Please follow the link below. Hold the CTRL button to open the link in a new window.
